It is very fast, extensible and licensed under the GNU GPLv2 license . I've been using Linux for a long time, but I was never entirely happy with the desktop environment options available. Which means that any customization made does not require the service to be restarted. For those who have used Tiling window managers longer than I have, what do you think of them? Configuration is achieved via plain text file and extending i3 is possible using its Unix domain socket and JSON based IPC interface from many programming languages.. Like wmii, i3 uses a control system very similar to that of vi. Sorry OP if I'm barging in. Xfce was my choice of desktop environment before I found i3. Posts: 2246 ; awesome window manager with polybar - no more conky « on: November 14, 2017, 12:47:24 AM » I'm really liking polybar, smooth panel works with most window managers. On the other hand, dwm isn’t as easy to customize and configure. It's a very good choice, but ... it does have some problems with programs like Android Studio and Android Emulator (that aren't optimized for tilling WMs). From changing all keyboard shortcuts, to redefining the name of the workspaces, to modifying the status bar, you can make i3 behave in any way that makes the most sense for your needs. On my laptop I have mine bound to Mouse window movement is easier for me too, I can Mod+Right Click drag windows to different locations and monitors. I've since converted to i3 on my netbook as well. C. Anything. A tiling window manager automatically arranges the windows to occupy the whole screen in a non-overlapping way. i3-status has a nice feel, really like the design of piping anything. Using your Linux distribution’s package manager, search for “i3 window manager”, and install it. Ricardo Gerardi is a Senior Consultant at Red Hat Canada where he specializes in IT automation with Ansible and Openshift. You are responsible for ensuring that you have the necessary permission to reuse any work on this site. TL;DR: Both are great, it just boils down to preference. In addition, i3 is flexible. With practice, it means you'll improve the speed and efficiency of your workflow. Linux provides a lot of customization. Including: Awesome, bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, Deepin, i3, LXDE, LXQt, MATE, and Openbox. However, the config is not in plaintext and it does not dynamically tile like i3. So, I'm interested in trying out a tiling window manager for my laptop. i3 requires more keystrokes to get the layout I want when opening more then 2 windows. Awesome is great on a netbook where I usually have only 1, sometimes 2 windows on screen at a time, but I found that the predefined layouts were cumbersome with this much screen space. To achieve this goal, awesome has been designed as a framework window manager. So to me (XFCE user) it seems like you just haven't eplored those WM's very well before switchting to i3. I really like it, and I'll probably continue using it even if I don't have the nice GTK themes, but obviously it would be nicer to From experience: just be careful when switching to tiling wm, you may like them so much that seeing anything not-tiling will make you cringe. Recent posts Bash Helpers for Quick Installs August 14, 2020 Arrested DevOps … The trees of splits, tabs and stacks were just what I needed, the documentation is great and with just a few easy changes to the configuration I was happy with it. I'd also consider it less 'newbie-friendly,' but who cares? I've read about the different tiling window managers on the wiki, I've tried Awesome before, and I've seen several videos of i3 in use. He has experience in the telecommunications sector, having worked as Senior Architect at TELUS, and had previous experience as Senior Consultant and Pre-Sales specialist for Network Management solutions at IBM Brazil and IBM Canada for 13 years. The goal of a window manager is to control the appearance and placement of windows in a windowing system. For more details, consult i3's documentation. Another really major difference between i3 and awesome is the way they handle multi-monitor setups. Submit an article proposal today. You don't have to enter the assigment with text = you can press the appropriate keys themselves when setting. Thanks, I also use tmux all the time. Deepin; The … These include opening the terminal and other programs, resizing and positioning windows, changing layouts, and even exiting i3. Winkey+7 = tile to top-left. Sat 28 September 2013 by Chris Glass in Ubuntu. That being said, it seems to be missing some of the functionality I really loved with Awesome. The i3 wm components usually need elaborate installation and detailed configuration steps. Yes. I seem to remember it working nicely out of the box on Awesome, though. Since you don't need to worry about window positioning, i3 generally makes better use of your screen real estate. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say. Could you enlighten me a little bit on what you mean by Dynamic vs Explicit? This article just scratches the surface of what i3 can do. i3 exists virtually everywhere, on every Linux distribution. e.g. Enter i3. As a developer, I value these features, as I can use the extra capacity to power my favorite development tools or test stuff locally using containers or virtual machines. At first try I was a bit lost.. but after a bit reading and custom, now I use it from time to time. Never tried tiling before. awesome tries to complete these tools with what we miss: an extensible, highly configurable window manager. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. i3 is primarily targeted at advanced users and developers. Latest Videos. Pro. I created a poll on YouTube for you, the viewer, to help me decide on my next window manager to use on my main production machine. It is designed to be simple and efficient. Based upon the experiences we made when wanting to hack/fix wmii, I'm sorry, but a lot of points you bring up as advantages of i3 are common to most window managers, including the ones from XFCE, GNOME and KDE. Very Unix philosophy friendly. I find I only use the 'tile' and 'floating' layout in Awesome. To conclude, as in every one of these threads, individual preference trumps what anyone else says. That part wasn't making a whole lot of sense to me. One of the nicest things about Linux (and open source software in general) is the freedom to choose among different alternatives to address our needs. If you value simplicity and efficiency and are not afraid of working with the keyboard, i3 is the window manager for you. Having explicit tiling sounds good, but I rarely have any more need then one fully vertical window with a 2nd column of secondary windows. Essentially the same memory footprint as conky, and not as blingy - but user can create their own … I can Mod+Right Click drag windows to different locations and monitors. On my desktop, I feel that the way the 9 tags are split between all of your monitors is a bit awkward to live with 24/7. I use XFCE with i3 shortcuts and rofi, truly the best of both worlds. I think the main difference is when you open a new terminal it is automatically placed on the screen and the existing ones are resized to accommodate.... You can easily move the windows with keystrokes to rearrange the layout .....as far as I'm aware these features are not supported by other WMs and this is the main advantage of tiling window managers. It’s very fast… Though there is still some work to be done in this area. How would you compare i3 to awesome, awesome to i3, etc.? i3 with rofi menu and dunst desktop notifications. The main benefit is that you don't often need to switch contexts from the keyboard to the mouse. You can have floating windows in i3 as well. – Ned64 Oct 15 '16 at 12:21 It is primarily targeted at power users, developers and any people dealing with every day computing tasks and who want to have fine-grained control on their graphical environment. On one hand, I really liked Awesome's behavior, specifically the ability to control which tabs are shown, and the ability to have several tabs/workspaces shown on the same screen at once. You can bind these to whatever key-combo you want. Another annoyance with regular desktop environments: the windows positioning, especially when you open a new window. Following are the top five reasons I use the i3 window manager and recommend it for a better Linux desktop experience. Some examples: I3 is fully configurable, and you can control every aspect of it by updating the default configuration file. windows; linux; i3; windows; linux; i3; Career 2.0 - Go Training, Videos, Speaking. When you start using i3, you need to memorize a few of those shortcuts to get around and, with time, you'll use more of them. I3 is a tiling window manager. Awesome can be skinned, configured, and extended with Lua, a language with a programming model similar to the ubiquitous Javascript. Navigating between windows and tags in Awesome is easy, and it's also pretty easy to set up automatic tag management (add terminals to tag 2, firefox to 3, music player to 9 etc). The window layout isn't just a layout, it morphs and changes according to your needs at any given moment. It works well for me, but I'm also interested in any good fvwm schemes others (such as yourself) have found agreeable. Hybrid. It always felt random to me, which means that you always need to position your windows manually after opening them with the … For more discussion on open source and the role of the CIO in the enterprise, join us at The EnterprisersProject.com. 3. For example, you can put the browser on one workspace, the terminal on another, an email client on a third, etc. (pre-)automated layouts (I have two scripts: one for 'large screen' mode and one for 'laptop screen' mode). Budgie. Material Shell is a fantastic new GNOME Shell extension/user experience currently in development. Docs; Screens; FAQ; Contact; Bugs; i3-2.png VIM, MPlayer. None. Press +num to switch to workspace num. Cool screenshot! Go 1.7 Released. The downside is, I didn't like Awesome's configuration methods at all. awesome is a free and open-source next-generation tiling manager for X built to be fast … You will not find many distros using the i3 tiling window manager. If you switch to that workspace, you switch to that monitor—without moving your hand off the keyboard. Window managers are often used as part a full-featured desktop environment (such as GNOME or Xfce), but some can also be used as standalone applications. The control panel is accessed with the keyboard shortcut Super key + c, for example. You need to learn a few basic shortcuts to get around at the beginning, but they'll soon feel natural and you'll start using them without thinking. Switching workspaces is quick and easy. If you need more space for a particular window, enable full-screen mode or switch to a different layout, such as stacked or tabbed. Once the control panel launches, you can arrow down a list of settings or use the mouse. That's an interesting use case. I used to use "ion" a long time ago (2003 ish), and awesome comes close to how I remember it, although there's still some things I liked about Ion that I haven't seen reproduced in any of the current tiling WMs. i3 stands on top of X Window Manager or X11, which has been a standard for these last +30 years for providing the building blocks for windows managers or desktop environments (Gnome, KDE, XFCE,…). Stacking window managers behave analogously to pieces of paper on a physical desktop, they can be stacked on top of one another, with the one at the top of the stack being the one with which the user sees and interacts. It also allows you to get to what you need faster. XMonad is ideal for you if you want totally extensible in Haskell and you will not be limited … (Yes, it's annoying that it's not h/j/k/l, i rebound them..). e.g. Hi. awesome. Haven't found a way to do that in i3. https://victorhckinthefreeworld.com/2017/04/12/i3-en-gnulinux-para-curio... http://skliarie.blogspot.com/2008/11/my-45-workplaces.html. Just seen another note about a distro featuring such a window manager: Awesome has been around for a few years now, but may be gaining some visibility now that Sabayon Linux has added an awesome edition.Guest author Koen Vervloesem has been using awesome for a number of years, and subscribers can click below for his look at the window manager from this week's edition. Though in my case I 'got tiling' only after I decided to give it a full-blown go on my main machine (as opposed to switching for an hour and 'playing with it' - I don't think that will work; too much of a paradigm shift). That becomes a deterrent to trying the tiling window manager. With … Send us home-grown sysadmin scripts. It covers all my needs and is very light. There are many useful cases for this. "Winkey+ appropriate key on numpad" These changes cannot be made for Wayland sessions yet. AwesomeWM sports superior flexibility and in my experience a lower learning threshold, i3 has superior documentation and very easy configuration. I can see the appeal, configuration is much better/easier. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. I'm an i3 wm user for about 2 months, I think. External. No resizing windows with the mouse so you can see many terminals at the same time, it's all done automatically, and when you know the bindings its second nature and very fast to use. Yes, because you can configure the tiles to have very thin or no borders. Hello! i3 is a tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii and written in C. It supports tiling, stacking, and tabbing layouts, which it handles dynamically. Regolith Linux is designed for people who prefer a spartan interface with polished and consistent system management. i3 also allows for things like moving a tag from one screen to the next. Imagine GNOME Shell and the i3 window manager got married, settled down, and had a kid — that kid would grow up to be Material Shell. In the end I went back to Awesome. ), On the other hand, I've heard that i3 is a little easier to configure, which is good. You can even change i3's configuration to always assign specific applications to their own workspaces. In i3, a workspace is an easy way to group windows. In i3, you can define shortcuts for everything. I'd like to stress out that such major documentation is not translated at all. awesome is a highly configurable, next generation framework window manager for X. For example, to open a new terminal, press +. Awesome. Windows managers can be dynamic, stacking, or tiling in their behavior. don't quote me on this but I believe i3 can be configured to approximate Awesome's behaviour on this (or at least how I remember its behaviour, it's been a while since I used it). Most of my understanding of what the different LUA objects are and what to do with them was pieced together by reading the rather cryptic online documentation and experimenting in awesome-client. Until last year, Xfce was the closest to what I consider a good compromise between features and performance. If you end up not liking i3, I'd give awesome a try. I use i3 standalone because it's fast and lightweight. Screenshot: https://postimg.cc/image/46672jx31/. In Awesome, the default is to have all window titles listed in series, similar to many taskmanager bars. Deepin. Some say it is for advanced users, but that is not necessarily the case. Other window managers are only available when using X.org. window manager, completely written from scratch. You’ll also need to inst… This article was created in neovim for Linux, running on a zsh shell inside i3 window manager running in a MobaXTerm X Server on a Windows 10 laptop. Budgie; The main Budgie article. (That is, the ability to have windows from several different tabs/workspaces showing at the same time). It is neither bloated nor fancy. With xfce4, have you tried looking at the settings under "window manager"? Screencast of v4.1. However, my experience with the documentation is that it is horrendously bad. I've been using fvwm for many years. Dynamic window managers are window managers that can dynam… Me too. Way Cooler is also a tiling window manager, described by its developers as "heavily inspired by the tiling of i3 and the extensibility of awesome". The slick set-up … I'd been using GNOME3 on a stationary computer with two rather large screens, and wasn't very happy with it for various reasons. It's written in Rust, but along with bringing all the security guarantees of the language, it also requires extensions to be granted permissions, unlike X11, where any app has free reign to do things like capture all keystrokes. To save screen real state, I prefer not to have window titles right on top of each window. Red Hat and the Red Hat logo are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Switched to i3, the config is sane, the docs are better, the manual tiling allows me to have any layout easily. It's meant to have clean, readable code, handle multimonitor in a good way, and not impose stupid limits on SLOC (I don't think awesome does, but DWM has a limit). It's a good choice! i3; awesome; dwm; Related posts: What is a Window Manager? Almost 10 years ago (and who knows how many years I used it before that) I wrote post on my custom FVWM based setup:http://skliarie.blogspot.com/2008/11/my-45-workplaces.html, And needless to say - I still use it, doubling my performance as sysadmin :), Arie: Can you send me your fvwm config file? It is designed to be simple and efficient. i3 requires more keystrokes to get the layout I want when opening more then 2 windows. LUA was a bit tricky at first, but after spending some time reading scripts, solutions and fragments of tutorials it started to make sense and I managed to write up some simple widgets for my panel. The extra room can make a big difference on a small screen. It helps you be more productive whether it’s for your work or if you’re doing it as a hobby. Cinnamon. It's easy to get started with, I can definitely recommend it as a first tiling WM. The opinions expressed on this website are those of each author, not of the author's employer or of Red Hat. Awesome is a customizable, “next-generation” Window manager framework for the Xorg/X11 graphical server. Screen shots: i3 in MobaXTerm i3 behind Windows. Here are some examples: Now that I am used to this workflow, I can't see myself going back to a regular desktop environment. Plasma lets you use another window manager, such as i3, bspwm or any other tilling window manager. v-split, h-split. I3 strives to be minimal and use few system resources, but that does not mean it can't be pretty. Finally, there is another, special type of workspace in i3: the scratchpad. Awesome was the first window manager to be ported to use the asynchronous XCB library instead of XLib, making it much more responsive than most other window managers. On a 2005 laptop, switching from the Windows kernel to Linux is like killing a mosquito with a RPG launcher. Not as flexible as Awesome, but it provides all the functionality I personally need right now right out of the box. It replaces the standard GNOME Shell workflow with a unique, keyboard-driven one, with a heavy focus on window tiling and key combos. I use AwesomeWM(https://awesomewm.org/) initiated by one of the Red Hatter Julien Danjou and it works like a charm. The few distros that offer i3 as a sort of desktop option are built into Arch-based distros. It is neither bloated nor fancy. I used AwesomeWM for a about a year on my netbook, and I still love it. The dwm window manager focuses more on being lightweight. Combine that with a nice terminal-driven text editor (e.g., Vim) and a keyboard-focused browser for a fully keyboard-driven workflow. I3 s a dynamic tiling window manager insp i red by wmii and is entirely different from Desktop Managers you may be used in the past like GNOME or KDE. For me, they look like the same thing, except for the fact that tabs are horizontal and stacks are vertically displayed. -- Peter. Also of a note: i3 has a pretty robust IPC system which can be made to script sessions startups - i.e. Using i3 does the same, minus 5 Celsius degrees. Verdict: A very nice window manager, and a dream for anyone who likes tinkering and customizing - the options are literally endless, if you're willing to put some effort into it. Flexible. Finally, for more advanced users, i3 provides a full interprocess communication (IPC) interface that allows you to use your favorite language to develop scripts or programs for even more customization options. Reg… I3 makes extensive use of keyboard shortcuts to control different aspects of your environment. Get the highlights in your inbox every week. I have long outstanding issues with my Awesome config, but overall behavior better matches my work flow. For example, the entire code base never exceeded 2000 lines of code. Warning. but I found the best way with the xfce and tmux. Since the windows are automatically positioned, you can start typing your commands right away. A month or two ago I decided to try i3 after hearing good things about it. That said, some Linux distributions may name it differently in their package management systems, so it’s always good to do a search first. I'm also thinking about installing polybar and using that instead of XFCE's panels. Besides the config part I was a happy awesome user till I bought a 21:9 monitor and the fixed awesome layouts just wouldn't cut it. If you get into the habit of always assigning applications/groups of windows to the same workspace, you can quickly switch between them, which makes workspaces a very useful feature. XMonad. Awesome, or awesomewm, is a window manager which comes with a lot of features, right out of the box.It is written in the Lua programming language (almost), but configuring it does not require a lot of knowledge about the same. Many window managers also have a --replace option, like so: awesome --replace&, called from a shell or startup option. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. As usual in i3, do it with a keyboard shortcut. In i3, the only option seemed to only have them, or not. tile window to the: Author Topic: awesome window manager with polybar - no more conky (Read 6400 times) PackRat. Opensource.com aspires to publish all content under a Creative Commons license but may not be able to do so in all cases. I have installed i3 since more than 1 year ago and I really like it, also I have this WM fully integrated with Plasma (my favourite Desktop Manager) and it is very useful. Haven't tried awesome, but I can say that i3 has a very clean config. Does it make sense to use tiling WM on a netbook? Window re-sizing is more intuitive in Awesome, for me anyway. You can group them in different ways according to your workflow. I used i3 for a pretty long time. Since the i3 window manager is largely a keyboard-driven interface, very little in the way of a graphical user display exists in Regolith Linux. With the Linux kernel I can use Firefox, my VPN, Kile, Tor, and Krita on a T5500 CPU. It can be configured during runtime. A colleague of mine suggested that I should try tiling window managers, and proceeded to produce a list of them, including i3, awesome, wmii and xmonad. As a developer, I value these features, as I can use the extra capacity to power my favorite development tools or test stuff locally using containers or virtual machines. The i3 Window Manager is an extremely lightweight, fast, text-oriented alternative to the other Desktop Environments and Window Managers I have discussed so far. But I still don't understand the differences between tabs (Mod+w) vs stacks (Mod+s). (I don't know lua, and I have no major problem with learning something new, but in the half a month that I used awesome, I never really got it setup the way I wanted it. Can write internal state to a FIFO. It's extremely fast, small, dynamic and heavily extensible using the Lua programming language. i3 is a dynamic tiling window manager with clean, readable and documented code, featuring extended Xinerama support, usage of libxcb instead of xlib and several improvements over wmii . In addition, you can use workspaces to control multi-monitor setups, where each monitor gets an initial workspace. For me the biggest reason I switched to i3 from awesome was sane defaults. A window manager controls the placement and appearance of windows within a windowing system. He is currently interested in hacking stuff using the Go Programming... 6 open source tools for staying organized, Free online course: RHEL Technical Overview. Because i3 is a window manager, it doesn't provide tools to enable customizations; you need external tools for that. In this video we take a look at i3wm and the power and productivity that comes with this powerful windows manager that can be used as a desktop environment. There’s not a Linux distributionout there that doesn’t have it in the package repositories. One big thing I missed with i3 was the window navigation. In Awesome, I love just cycling thought all windows in a clockwise fashion using 'j' and 'k', vs. explicitly going up/down left/right. … For example, system administrators can open several terminals to monitor or work on different remote systems simultaneously; and developers can use their favorite IDE or editor and a few terminals to test their programs. Navigating and manipulating windows was a bit awkward at first, but eventually I found that i3 makes it much easier to manipulate layouts just like I wanted in just a few keystrokes. I'm a happy Plasma user, but time ago I tried i3wm. I’ve found that on a laptop that I connect and disconnect to external monitors freely, i3 is more dynamic and allows me to preserve my tiling layouts as I move around. I find i3's window containers like to equally scale all windows in a little limiting.
2020 awesome window manager vs i3