– Part 2. Now, when Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel had to serve his father he did it, no question about it. Averell A. Lv 7. That is the message of Romans 9:10-13. The election was not about personal salvation and standing before God (thus, it wasn’t the unconditional election Calvinism proposes), it was only about who would be the recipient to the Abrahamic Covenant. In this lab, John Piper highlights the similarities and differences between these brothers. When one reads Genesis 25:23 in the Pentateuch (as opposed to reading it in Romans 9), one learns that God was not only talking about the two individuals Jacob and Esau, but He was also talking about two nations and peoples. God knows the hearts of men and women and can see how they will react to His ways. He’s not merely rash or ill-counseled. The biggest error that Esau could have made was the fact that he did not think much of the fullness of the birthright. Second, the inheritance rights were a bit more important than pocket money. What Did Esau Look Like? I mean, you find plenty of people named “Jacob” or “Jake” or “Jack” or “James”, but how many “Esaus” do you know? So many interpretations and comments pro Jacob, anti Esau lead me to be believe that within your perspective people of the earth, hunters, tend to be evil. God is using a figure of speech called synecdoche (in synecdoche, a part of the whole is used to represent the whole). Dec. 25. 4:47; 11:11), conveying a sense of urgency. The word translated “oracle” frequently heads prophetic passages (e.g., Isa. God did not declare hatred for Esau from the time Esau was conceived until the times of Moses. God declares that He has turned the land of Esau (of Edom) into a wasteland for dragons, that He will destroy whatever the people of Edom try to rebuild, and that God has an indignation forever against the people of Edom for their wickedness. On the other hand, God did not choose Esau and his descendants as the recipients of the Abrahamic Covenant, so therefore God did not choose to love Edom in the same way He loves Israel. 32 And Esau said, Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me? Source(s): The Bible. Esau sold his position of inheritance for self-indulgence...twice!! Where Esau seems gloriously wild, Jacob is… domesticated. To find favor in your eyes, my lord, he said. (Genesis 27:1-40) The family blessing was more personal than the birthright. On the one hand, Jacob is obviously the hero. said Jacob. Why not throw another figure of speech? As they grew up, Esau became an excellent hunter while Jacob stayed near home. . The plot thickens. “See to it that no-one is sexually immoral, or is godless like Esau, who for a single meal sold his inheritance rights as the eldest son…”. The incident where Esau rashly “sells” the birthright to Jacob for some stew reveals that Esau did not appreciate the gravity of this blessing and that Jacob had had his eye on it. 1) When Esau says he is about to die, is this figuratively (from hunger) or literally he thinks he is close to dying from old age? In other words, Paul is using Genesis 25:23 to interpret Malachi 1:2-3, and Malachi 1:2-3 to complement Genesis 25:23. 34 Then Jacob gave Esau bread and pottage of lentiles; and he did eat and drink, and rose up, and went his way: thus Esau despised his birthright. Verses 10-12. In part one we saw that Esau’s priorities were wrong and he had no thought for consequences. Conclusion: God is in control of our world and our lives. I expected that at some point, because we are dealing with an omnipotent being, God was going to reverse the blessings, but that doesn’t happen. In light of these factors, one can safely conclude that Romans 9:11-13 does not teach unconditional election (the doctrine of Calvinism that teaches God chooses some people to believe in Jesus Christ for salvation and others to reject Jesus Christ for condemnation); instead, Romans 9:11-13 teaches that God unconditionally elected Jacob and his descendants as the recipients of the Abrahamic Covenant. Maybe, maybe not. But we do know that Isaac did not repent of giving the blessing to Jacob, even though Esau sought him with tears to repent. When Esau learns of his brother's thievery, he is livid and begs his father to undo the blessing. Even more, God also commanded the Jews not to abhor the Edomites (Deuteronomy 23:7). The narrative portions of the Old Testament are frequently fairly opaque when it comes to levelling moral judgment against a person. 4). For this reason, it is said that Esau despised his birthright. We think it’s a synonym for “evil” or “pagan” or “atheist”, and we’re apt to throw it around as a general-purpose insult meaning “anyone who doesn’t agree with us”. That is why God rejected Esau and chose Jacob. So Esau accepts the trade and it says "he despised his birthright." Doesn’t the Bible teach that God loves everyone? One should take in consideration the context in which Paul makes this reference. As Abraham’s grandchildren, thousands of sheep, goats, camels and donkeys. That phrase, as it is written, shows that Paul sees Genesis 25:23 and Malachi 1:2-3 as being in agreement with each other. Give me stew now, I can’t wait any longer!”. The Bible seems fairly convinced that, as stupid as it sounds, he actually knew what he was doing. 1 decade ago. Home. In Malachi 1:2-3, God states that He hated Esau. The first verse of the book does more than give information about its human author. This, then, is what’s wrong with Esau. He’s not merely rash or ill-counseled. The Lord made him as well as you; and died for him as well as for you; and wills his salvation as well as yours; and if you cheat him the Lord will avenge him speedily. Why did God allow Jacob to steal Esau’s blessing and get away with it? This is a reference back to Malachi 1:2-4. Esau sold his inheritance, sold the responsibilities, sold the honor, and he sold God’s covenant – he didn’t think much of God’s covenant? You’re going to get some more pocket money next week; the inheritance rights are your future. It may more accurately read “Jacob I chose, and Esau I did not choose”. But when we realize that by demanding instant gratification, Esau proved he didn’t care about the covenant promise God made with his father and grandfather. He’s willing to trade something of ongoing importance (his property rights as the firstborn) and infinite value (including the promises made to Abraham that God had not fulfilled yet) for a bowl of stew. Perhaps more aware than we that moral judgment of that sort is reserved for God alone, the narrative books are frequently quiet on the morality of an event, simply recording it as having happened. Inherently, he was no better than Esau, but his outlook on life—his perspective or worldview—was decidedly different. God’s point is that when God declared Jacob and his descendants to be the recipients of the Abrahamic Covenant, God chose to love the nation Israel. But what did Esau do? Once again Rebecca intervenes to save her younger son from being murdered by his elder twin brother, Esau. 1:21) spoken by a human messenger. God rejected Esau (who was also called “Edom”) and did not choose him to be the father of His chosen people. Also, this happened when they were a bit older than ten. Why would God make such a statement after so long? But do not make that an excuse for robbing and cheating Esau, because he is not as thoughtful as you are. Just reading the Jacob/Esau segments give me the impression that Esau got a bum rap right from the start. So he sent a lavish gift ahead of him and asked God to save him (Genesis 32:9–15). It had no value for him. (This message shows that God chooses people according to His own purposes; He calls people, but not according to their good or bad works) She was told, Your older son will serve your younger son. God responds, “Was not Esau Jacob's brother? And Jacob said, Swear to me this day; and he sware unto him: and he sold his birthright unto Jacob. What did poor old Esau do to deserve that? Paul was not saying, “By the way guys, just so you know, God loves Jacob and He hates Esau… I just wanted you to know who God’s friends are.” No, Paul makes reference to Malachi 1:2-3 to explain that not all of Abraham’s descendants will receive the promises made in the Abrahamic Covenant (you can read “Is Jacob’s Election a Sample of Unconditional Election” for more information: Paul wants to prove that God has not broken his promises to Israel). Let me respond by offering a series of observations. Of course, the answer is that God did not change His mind about Esau several hundred years after Esau was dead; the issue is that in Malachi 1:2-3 God is using figurative language to get Israel’s attention. When Esau saw that his parents weren’t pleased, he didn’t come to them and repent, asking what he could do to make things right. Isaac responds to his eldest son's plea by saying that he only had one blessing to give and that he could not reverse the sacred blessing. Furthermore, Esau always seems so much more honest than the shifty, cunning Jacob. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. ( Log Out /  Esau REJECTED God and had his OWN values. After all, in the first three verses of Malachi there is an instance of personification (Israel speaks as one person) and there are two instances of synecdoche (Jacob represents the nation of Israel, and Esau represents the nation of Edom). By Black History In The Bible. God was protecting Esau’s possession (Deuteronomy 2:4-8)! The Book of Genesis speaks of the relationship between fraternal twins Jacob and Esau, sons of Isaac and Rebekah, focusing on Esau's loss of his birthright to Jacob and the conflict that ensued between their descendant nations because of Jacob's deception of their aged and blind father, Isaac, in order to receive Esau's birthright/blessing from Isaac. What Did Esau Look Like? Question: Why did you limit your reference in regards to Esau / Idumea / the Edomites? Instead, Romans 9 teaches that God unconditionally elected Jacob to be the recipient of the Abrahamic Covenant: that Jacob would be blessed, that his seed would be blessed, and that the world would be blessed through his seed. All he cared about was that he was hungry right then. It virtually says so; he’s the one from whom the Twelve Tribes descend, he’s the one we follow when the two part ways, he’s the one we still name children after to this day. He didn’t send his wives back to their families, which might have pleased his mother and father. This latter point is actually more pertinent to Paul’s argument in Romans 9, since in that passage Paul is actually arguing that God has not broken His promises to Israel by requiring Jews (and gentiles) to believe in Jesus Christ for salvation. All he cared about was that he was hungry right then. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. Otherwise, Ishmael would have also been sentenced to Hell when God chose Isaac and not Ishmael as the recipient of the Abrahamic Covenant, but God was merciful to Ishmael. The Bible seems fairly convinced that, as stupid as it sounds. He did not say CERTAIN ones who do not accept Jesus, READ Matthew 13:36-40.. ALL of them, as for accepting Christ, all false, John 6:44, John 15:16, Romans 8:29 GOD chooses his people, he said he would take just ONE from each city~” “Ashkenaz and Sephards, harbor the DNA of Esau/Edom. Yet, Romans predicts that God would love Jacob. No, please! There are several factors that indicate this statement should not be taken literally: (a) God’s rejection of Ishmael as recipient of the Abrahamic Covenant did not mean God hated Ishmael, so His rejection of Esau as the recipient of the Abrahamic Covenant should not mean that He hated Esau; (b) God did not reveal hatred for Esau to Rebekah in Genesis 25:23; (c) God protected Esau and His descendants from Israel’s attacks and hatred during the times of Moses; (d) the statement in Malachi 1:2-3 was made several hundred years after Esau was dead; (e) Malachi uses with complexity several figures of speech in its first few verses; (f) and the same passage in Malachi explains that God’s actions are actually against the nation of Edom, not Esau himself. And having through deception blessed Jacob, He is now saying to Esau let me tell you he will indeed be blessed, because I did my dead level best not to bless him. It is conceivable that during the times of the patriarchs there lived other people who were also “saved” like Abraham and Jacob, but who were not partakers of the Abrahamic Covenant. The Talmud learns that the day of Abraham’s death was the same day Esau violated a young bride and committed his first murder, in addition to other sins. Change ). And God in His wisdom and almighty power and sovereignty and providence arranged it so that I was made a fool of, and I blessed him, and let me tell you one thing, Esau, he will be blessed. Even a shifty deceiver is better than that. One day Esau came home exhausted and wanted to eat some of Jacob's red stew. This conflict was paralleled by the affection the parents had for their favored child: "Isaac, who had a taste for wild game, loved Esau, but Rebe 2017. so much more like hero material. Most prophesies are expressed in poetry. Still, both were righteous before God (Genesis 14:18, Job 1:1). Beginning on verse 10 of Romans 9, Paul now demonstrates that the Abrahamic Covenant is not even for all of Abraham’s descendants through Isaac, but only for those through Isaac’s son Jacob, not Esau. No, he once more took matters into his own hands and married Ismael’s daughter, a third wife. Most likely, God loved the person we know as Esau, brother of Jacob and son of Isaac. In verses 3 to 5 of Malachi 1, God describes His hatred not for Esau, but for the nation of Edom. The men couldn’t live in the same area because God had … And Esau said, Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me? Then it gets kinda weird because Isaac's wife, Rebekah, tells her son, Jacob, to trick Isaac into thinking he is Esau and give the blessing to him. After reading “Is Jacob’s Election a Sample of Unconditional Election”, the reader may still have questions about God’s stated hatred for Esau: Why did God hate Esau? It reads like “bow down and lick my feet!” or “donkeys will learn to talk first” or “when pigs fly!”  The “yeah, right!” ludicrous request of someone who’s still cooking. Marcelo Carcach (author) from Westminster, MD on August 27, 2018: Thank-you very much. In Romans 9:13, Paul makes a reference to Malachi 1:2-3, where God states that he loved Jacob and hated Esau. 17 Comments. "But before they were born, before they had done anything good or bad, she received a message from God. So, considering the context, God loving Jacob and hating Esau has nothing to do with the human emotions of love and hate. It reads like “bow down and lick my feet!” or “donkeys will learn to talk first” or “when pigs fly!”  The “yeah, right!” ludicrous request of someone who’s. If I have found favor in your eyes, accept this gift from me. The Bible plainly shows that Jacob's election gave him a decided advantage over Esau in fulfilling God's purpose. Just because God chose baby Jacob to be the recipient of the Abrahamic Covenant does not mean God was sentencing baby Esau to Hell. Why did God continue to bless Jacob? Old enough that Esau was out hunting all day without supervision, while Jacob was back home cooking borscht. Then Jacob gave Esau bread and pottage of lentiles; and he did eat and drink, and rose up, and went his way: thus Esau despised his birthright.
2020 what did esau do wrong